From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Aug 4 05:06:36 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 01E0F1065670; Thu, 4 Aug 2011 05:06:36 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 05:06:35 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Cy Schubert Message-ID: <20110804050635.GA17223@FreeBSD.org> References: <20110804012452.GA97859@FreeBSD.org> <201108040451.p744pY9X006786@cwsys.cwsent.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <201108040451.p744pY9X006786@cwsys.cwsent.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG, bapt@freebd.org, ports-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG, Cy Schubert Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/x11/gcursor Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist ports/x11/gcursor/files patch-data::gcursor.desktop.in patch-src::gcursor.c X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: **OBSOLETE** CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 04 Aug 2011 05:06:36 -0000 On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 09:51:34PM -0700, Cy Schubert wrote: > In message <20110804012452.GA97859@FreeBSD.org>, Alexey Dokuchaev writes: > > On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 08:21:04PM +0000, Cy Schubert wrote: > > > cy 2011-08-03 20:21:04 UTC > > > > > > Removed files: > > > x11/gcursor Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist > > > x11/gcursor/files patch-data::gcursor.desktop.in > > > patch-src::gcursor.c > > > Log: > > > Gcursor is unmaintained by upline (Ubuntu). > > > > I believe the standard practice is to drop maintainership, mark the port > > as deprecated and maybe set an expiration date rather than simply delete > > it: maybe some users still want it. > > This port was deleted by bapt@ using his portmgr hat about three months ago > because the distfile was no longer available. I resurrected it and assumed > maintainership a few days ago however learning that it is no longer > maintained by an upline, portmgr made the right decision to delete it at > that time. I just reimplemented what was done three months ago. OK, thanks for clarification. ./danfe