From owner-freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jun 26 12:42:15 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E76106567C for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B798FC21 for ; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:42:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from bb.ipt.ru ([194.62.233.89]) by services.ipt.ru with esmtp (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1KBqnm-000Hs2-3I; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:42:14 +0400 To: Bill Moran References: <62852722@bb.ipt.ru> <20080625103721.bdc7daee.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> <93253417@bb.ipt.ru> <20080625130401.e03329dc.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 16:42:04 +0400 In-Reply-To: <20080625130401.e03329dc.wmoran@collaborativefusion.com> (Bill Moran's message of "Wed\, 25 Jun 2008 13\:04\:01 -0400") Message-ID: <50361347@bb.ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-jail@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: is nfs mount inside jail possible? X-BeenThere: freebsd-jail@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion about FreeBSD jail\(8\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 12:42:15 -0000 On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 13:04:01 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: > In response to Boris Samorodov : > > On Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:37:21 -0400 Bill Moran wrote: > > > > > In response to Boris Samorodov : > > > > > > > > ... nfs seems not to be jail friendly. Here is the question at > > > > subject. Thanks! > > > > > You can NFS mount on the host, and it will be visible within the jail. > > > Don't know if that helps your situation or not. > > > > Yep, I know it. I'd prefer to use mounts within a jail. They should be > > dynamic: a process mounts it, uses and unmounts. Otherwise there will > > be too many mounts... > How many is too many? Why do you think that number is too many? Approx. a thousand. For _me_ it is too many. ;-) > You could run the automounter on the host. Hm, I didn't think about it. Thanks for the pointer! WBR -- Boris Samorodov (bsam) Research Engineer, http://www.ipt.ru Telephone & Internet SP FreeBSD committer, http://www.FreeBSD.org The Power To Serve