From owner-freebsd-ports Sun Aug 6 18: 5:30 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from hub.lovett.com (hub.lovett.com [216.60.121.161]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7AFAF37BC9A; Sun, 6 Aug 2000 18:05:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from ade@lovett.com) Received: from ade by hub.lovett.com with local (Exim 3.16 #1) id 13LbLs-00009S-00; Sun, 06 Aug 2000 20:05:12 -0500 Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2000 20:05:12 -0500 From: Ade Lovett To: Akinori -Aki- MUSHA Cc: asami@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org, yasuf@bsdclub.org Subject: Re: Call for a new virtual category: "ruby" Message-ID: <20000806200512.A452@FreeBSD.org> References: <86og37a5jc.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> <20000806175148.D343@FreeBSD.org> <86zompvqgd.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <86zompvqgd.wl@localhost.local.idaemons.org>; from knu@idaemons.org on Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 09:56:50AM +0900 Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Mon, Aug 07, 2000 at 09:56:50AM +0900, Akinori -Aki- MUSHA wrote: > Six. databases/ruby-postgres, japanese/rubytk, lang/irb, lang/ruby, > x11-toolkits/ruby-gtk, and x11-toolkits/rubytk. Now I know there's minimal overhead in creating a new virtual category, but to my eyes, 6 is somewhat on the low side. Perhaps we can come to some consensus on exactly how many ports are needed for a virtual category. -aDe -- Ade Lovett, Austin, TX. ade@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD: The Power to Serve http://www.FreeBSD.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message