From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Dec 24 16:46:10 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502BF16A4CE
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:46:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp.mho.com (smtp.mho.net [64.58.4.6])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C54CD43D45
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 24 Dec 2003 16:46:06 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org)
Received: (qmail 6194 invoked by uid 1002); 25 Dec 2003 00:46:06 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO freebsd.org) (64.58.1.252)
  by smtp.mho.net with SMTP; 25 Dec 2003 00:46:06 -0000
Message-ID: <3FEA32F5.6040202@freebsd.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2003 17:44:37 -0700
From: Scott Long <scottl@freebsd.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.5) Gecko/20031103
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Scott W <wegster@mindcore.net>
References: <3FE93499.7060307@freebsd.org> <3FE9CA6E.4060902@mindcore.net>
In-Reply-To: <3FE9CA6E.4060902@mindcore.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Plans for 5.3
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Dec 2003 00:46:10 -0000

Scott W wrote:
> 
> Scott- this is somewhat off-topic, but does this mean that plans for 
> creating the 5-STABLE label are not going to happen at 5.2-RELEASE, but 
> instead at 5.3-RELEASE?  Sorry if I missed this being mentioned 
> somewhere, but last I saw was 5-STABLE at the release of 5.2 (or close 
> to)...?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Scott
> 
> 

Yes, this was discussed back in September.

Scott