From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 20 16:00:14 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC56216ABFC for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CAB13C48E for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:00:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id l1KG0EhF060554 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:00:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id l1KG0E5O060553; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:00:14 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Resent-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:00:14 GMT Resent-Message-Id: <200702201600.l1KG0E5O060553@freefall.freebsd.org> Resent-From: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org (GNATS Filer) Resent-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Resent-Reply-To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org, Douglas Wells Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 007C516A90A for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:57:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sysmaint@contek.com) Received: from smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.157.102]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C8E813C4A6 for ; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 15:57:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sysmaint@contek.com) Received: from mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net ([207.172.157.22]) by smtp02.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2007 10:57:15 -0500 Received: from smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net (smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net [207.172.4.11]) by mr02.lnh.mail.rcn.net (MOS 3.7.5a-GA) with ESMTP id MYC08433; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:57:07 -0500 (EST) Received: from 207-172-216-87.s849.apx1.sbo.ma.dialup.rcn.com (HELO mail.contek.com) ([207.172.216.87]) by smtp01.lnh.mail.rcn.net with ESMTP; 20 Feb 2007 10:57:01 -0500 Received: by mail.contek.com (Postfix, from userid 10112) id 0AE1939853; Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:56:59 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <20070220155700.0AE1939853@mail.contek.com> Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 10:56:59 -0500 (EST) From: Douglas Wells To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org X-Send-Pr-Version: 3.113 Cc: sysmaint@contek.com Subject: ports/109364: lang/g95 is improperly marked as being superseded by gfortran X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Douglas Wells List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2007 16:00:15 -0000 >Number: 109364 >Category: ports >Synopsis: lang/g95 is improperly marked as being superseded by gfortran >Confidential: no >Severity: non-critical >Priority: low >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Feb 20 16:00:13 GMT 2007 >Closed-Date: >Last-Modified: >Originator: Douglas Wells >Release: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 i386 >Organization: Connection Technologies >Environment: System: FreeBSD flame.contek.com 6.2-RELEASE-p1 FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p1 #0: Sun Feb 11 18:14:07 EST 2007 root@flame.contek.com:/other5/src.6.2/sys/i386/compile/FLAME.6.2 i386 Newly cvsup'd ports tree. I have also manually removed /usr/ports/MOVED and re-cvsup'd to verify integrity of MOVED. >Description: I have both gfortran-4.2 and g95 installed on my system from the ports tree. Recently I have noticed that an upgrade offsets to replace g95 with gfortran: "---> Upgrading 'g95-0.91.20070129' to 'gcc-withfortran-4.2.0_20070214' (lang/gfortran)" I believe this is an error and both the g95 and gfortran ports should be able to exist simultaneously. I suspect that this is due to a line in /usr/ports/MOVED: "lang/g95|lang/gfortran|2004-02-11|change to appropreate name" Due to the 2004 date, I would guess that gfortran used to installed as g95 and was moved to gfortran in 2004. Once the g95 was added (I first noticed the current g95 port in late January), I suspect that the line in MOVED should have been nullified in some manner. >How-To-Repeat: Install g95 (g95-0.91.20070129). Install gfortran (gcc-withfortran-4.2.0_20070124) Run portupgrade -rR >Fix: Perhaps by deleting relevant line from /usr/ports/MOVED >Release-Note: >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: