From owner-freebsd-current Thu Dec 16 9:36: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from modemcable156.106-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net (modemcable126.102-200-24.mtl.mc.videotron.net [24.200.102.126]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CFC4415645 for ; Thu, 16 Dec 1999 09:36:00 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from patrick@mindstep.com) Received: (qmail 52776 invoked from network); 16 Dec 1999 17:35:56 -0000 Received: from patrak.local.mindstep.com (HELO patrak) (192.168.10.4) by jacuzzi.local.mindstep.com with SMTP; 16 Dec 1999 17:35:56 -0000 Message-ID: <00c501bf47ec$01fee840$040aa8c0@local.mindstep.com> From: "Patrick Bihan-Faou" To: Cc: Subject: Status of the netatalk stack Date: Thu, 16 Dec 1999 12:35:55 -0500 Organization: MindStep Corporation MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hi, I was looking at the netatalk package and the appletalk support in the kernel source code and I realized that they are based on the same code originally (the code from netatalk). The kernel code however is quite out of date from what can be found in the netatalk-asun package. I was wondering if anybody is planning on integrating the latest changes ? If not is it something that I should undertake ? Are there any major reasons why the code in freebsd should be left alone ? PS. I cross-posted in current and stable because it affects both stream in the same way, however I guess the discussion should be kept in "current", so please try to reply to the correct address. Thanks. Patrick. -- www.mindstep.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message