From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 18 00:01:10 1995 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id AAA09568 for current-outgoing; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:01:10 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with SMTP id AAA09561 for ; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:01:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id AAA10726; Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:00:39 -0800 To: Poul-Henning Kamp cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD-current-stable ??? In-reply-to: Your message of "Sun, 17 Dec 1995 12:50:34 PST." <19611.819233434@freefall.freebsd.org> Date: Mon, 18 Dec 1995 00:00:38 -0800 Message-ID: <10724.819273638@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk [ cc: -= -hackers ] > > I think we're in violent agreement as to goals here, Poul, it's just the desired methods where we have some divergence. I don't think that our wishes are necessarily mutually exclusive, either. I think that -current can be good enough for *everyone* with just a little more effort being exerted. I do not speak as one who's hands are free of blood, either. I've certainly spammed -current few enough times, but I've also seen -current a lot less scary than it is right now. Maybe we could try to stagger these changes in a somewhat more coordinated fashion? Maybe we could even just go around the table once in -core and post a "what I'm up to and expect to be committing over the next 3 months" sort of thing? :-) Jordan