From owner-cvs-all Thu Feb 8 22:56:49 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7C7F337B67D; Thu, 8 Feb 2001 22:56:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from bde.zeta.org.au (bde.zeta.org.au [203.2.228.102]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id RAA29069; Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:56:03 +1100 Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 17:55:42 +1100 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-Sender: bde@besplex.bde.org To: Peter Wemm Cc: Mark Murray , Mike Heffner , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/lam lam.c In-Reply-To: <200102090410.f194AZU05387@mobile.wemm.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Peter Wemm wrote: > Bruce Evans wrote: > > On Thu, 8 Feb 2001, Mark Murray wrote: > > > > > > This just breaks K&R support and adds style bugs (spaces after function > > > > names, and **argv instead of *argv[]). > > > > > > K&R support is not important anymore. > > > > Some disagree. > > Then they can use a cc wrapper that feeds the C code through cproto or > something. They might use the "mail -s 'request-for-K&R-unbreakage'" wrapper :-). > > It is only not very important IMO. Not worth the effort > > to throw it away. > > It is visually offensive, and I am more than happy to provide the effort. __P(()) is much less visually offensive than things like LIST_FOREACH() which have been growing like weeds lately. Bruce To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message