From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 9 04:28:09 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A827316A418 for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 04:28:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from smtp.wizwire.com (smtp.wizwire.com [209.218.100.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89C0113C44B for ; Tue, 9 Oct 2007 04:28:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jahnke@sonatabio.com) Received: from [192.168.0.100] (207-104-43-151.starstream.net [207.104.43.151]) (authenticated bits=0) by smtp.wizwire.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l994QxcV020489; Mon, 8 Oct 2007 21:26:59 -0700 From: Frank Jahnke To: Khairil Yusof In-Reply-To: <1191816251.89805.31.camel@localhost> References: <1191517967.61533.122.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> <1191816251.89805.31.camel@localhost> Content-Type: text/plain Organization: Sonata Biosciences, Inc. Date: Mon, 08 Oct 2007 21:25:54 -0700 Message-Id: <1191903954.982.34.camel@pinot.fmjassoc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.12.0 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-WizWire-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information X-WizWire-MailScanner: Found to be clean X-MailScanner-From: jahnke@sonatabio.com Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: (minor) issues after upgrading to 2.20 X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: jahnke@sonatabio.com List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Oct 2007 04:28:09 -0000 On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 12:04 +0800, Khairil Yusof wrote: > > 4. The Tomboy icon is missing > > The icon is showing fine for me. I stated this poorly. I lost the Tomboy icon that I had placed on my top panel. It now works as expected. > > 7. Evolution gives many, many warning message, some of which are > > "critical." It has crashed on me a few times, and other times it > > becomes extremely unresponsive. > > Evolution here is fast and rock stable compared to 2.10. I have yet to > crash it. I'm a heavy user of Evo with very large mail boxes (12K+ > emails) IMAP and POP3. > Compared to 2.10, most any recent version of Evo is stable :). My email number is about the same as yours, and about 2GB in size. It is interesting that it has gotten more stable as I have used it. This is one thing I have observed about 2.20: its behavior changes with use. Very odd. Frank