From owner-freebsd-emulation@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Dec 12 05:00:06 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24E0A761 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-oa0-x229.google.com (mail-oa0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c02::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E03C719E8 for ; Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-oa0-f41.google.com with SMTP id j17so8491433oag.28 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:00:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=iYyZ1H8UxnUwz8q0k9FTQOk6nVWwgWZn0uwQFJHxJMY=; b=ll269kTDerP25yuY0aDlt4szZiHLTqnWk6AI13kQV3FmZrryDMumpIx+Oa9Vr2c2zQ Hl77zldzMywa/ykZ6msSN8bE8Dklk6a4dSX1H4vApLOrede4FFaknWzvEwNPFT9bCND5 ZIQcqSupeK2nqOIDkuvC5uA2PHCqbeikspQ8i7HO5BZI/JF6PyCOJER7W8g+l0dCpR7X Jh2ua8kyBj8KZ3ttfe5IYm8bgAJPJWUxVPxa2LzZZlSlpdxaqGuE34xGSiaQpG0QXacF BbfZhCL4nSEuQWJ0eUrWE17TmbdOX6C3+5n5IctSaWWVjnUFwfyuGf0IKvs3N64PcnVJ 9AFQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.70.134 with SMTP id m6mr3991373oeu.14.1386824405184; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:00:05 -0800 (PST) Sender: kob6558@gmail.com Received: by 10.76.182.105 with HTTP; Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:00:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2013 21:00:05 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: bIFePWi3E5a9D3gdh2KWgRsaaLw Message-ID: Subject: Re: VirtualBox bridged network and 10.0 From: Kevin Oberman To: Warren Block Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.17 Cc: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-emulation@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list List-Id: Development of Emulators of other operating systems List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 12 Dec 2013 05:00:06 -0000 On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Warren Block wrote: > VirtualBox 4.2.20 does not like the vboxnet service: > > # service vboxnet start > VBoxManage: error: Failed to create the VirtualBox object! > VBoxManage: error: Code NS_ERROR_ABORT (0x80004004) - Operation aborted > (extended info not available) > VBoxManage: error: Most likely, the VirtualBox COM server is not running > or failed to start. > > NAT networking that does not need the vboxnet service seems to work. Does > something need to be done differently on 10.0? This is amd64, > 10.0-PRERELEASE. > To ask the obvious, did you reboot or unload the old kernel modules and load the new ones? I can say it is working fine for me with 9-Stable (r256657) on amd64, but I ave not tried 10 yet as there have been a LOT of discussions of VB breakage on 10. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer E-mail: rkoberman@gmail.com