From owner-freebsd-hardware Sat Sep 27 20:45:04 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id UAA03728 for hardware-outgoing; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 20:45:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from peeper.my.domain ([208.128.8.69]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id UAA03706 for ; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 20:44:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from tom@localhost) by peeper.my.domain (8.8.7/8.7.3) id WAA12035; Sat, 27 Sep 1997 22:41:26 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <19970927224110.13321@my.domain> Date: Sat, 27 Sep 1997 22:41:10 -0500 From: Tom Jackson To: freebsd-hardware@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: supermicro p6sns/p6sas References: <19970926143047.44911@my.domain> <199709262008.PAA14381@compound.east.sun.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.81e In-Reply-To: <199709262008.PAA14381@compound.east.sun.com>; from Tony Kimball on Fri, Sep 26, 1997 at 03:08:05PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, Sep 26, 1997 at 03:08:05PM -0500, Tony Kimball wrote: > Quoth Tom Jackson on Fri, 26 September: > : Considering a new atx mb myself. Trying to decide between pent pro and > : pent II. Wondering if socket 8 is a deadend and if intel will upgrade > : this architexture ( think its much better than pent II) > > Socket 8 is a dead end. Slot 1 is also a dead end. Socket 7, on the > otherhand, shows no sign of slowing down, with AMD's 300 MHz K6 being > the fastest chip announced for it so far. Ugh, well maybe the announced, not released version, but definitely not the current releases of K6. Heard about the make world problem and the Linux problems.