From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Aug 12 08:48:44 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id IAA14525 for freebsd-questions-outgoing; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 08:48:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from alcatel.fr (ns.alcatel.fr [194.133.58.131]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id IAA14506 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 08:48:33 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr) From: Thierry.Herbelot@alcatel.fr Received: from alcatel.fr (gatekeeper-ssn.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.244]) by mailgate.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP) with ESMTP id RAA19372; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 17:53:10 +0200 Received: from aifhs1.alcatel.fr (aifhs1.alcatel.fr [155.132.180.86]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id PAA00070; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 15:35:27 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from aifhs2.alcatel.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by aifhs1.alcatel.fr (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01307; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 15:37:39 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (lune.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.144.65]) by aifhs2.alcatel.fr (ALCANET/SMTP2) with ESMTP id PAA29908; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 15:35:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from telss1 (telss1.telspace.alcatel.fr [155.132.51.4]) by lune.telspace.alcatel.fr (8.7.6/8.7.3) with SMTP id PAA07227; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 15:42:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: from telspace.alcatel.fr by telss1 (4.1/SMI-4.1) id AA16146; Wed, 12 Aug 98 15:31:00 +0200 Received: from localhost by telspace.alcatel.fr with SMTP (1.40.112.12/16.2) id AA299278293; Wed, 12 Aug 1998 15:24:53 +0200 X-Openmail-Hops: 1 Date: Wed, 12 Aug 98 15:24:41 +0200 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: Subject: Port vs package logic Mime-Version: 1.0 To: fbsdlist@federation.addy.com Cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; name="Port" Content-Disposition: inline; filename="Port" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello, >From what I've learned so far : - packages are pre-compiled directly installable applications, - ports are (essentially) the automated way of recompiling the same applications on your system. packages are great if : - you don't have the time to download sources from Internet - the compile options chosen by the release team are satisfactory. ports are preferable if : - you want to have the (almost) very latest versions of your favorite software on your box - you want to fine-tune the configuration of an application (e.g. : the package mgetty+sendfax in 2.2.5-R did not support incoming ppp sessions; for this feature, you had to use the port) Hope this helps TfH PS : the ports tree is updated via CVS, thus you can be up to date by using CVSUP (you still have to get the original sources via the 'NET) > What is the logic of a particular software package ending up in the > packages installable from sysinstall vs the ports tree? For example, I > noticed during the install of 2.2.7 that tcsh is no longer installable > from sysinstall's "Packages" option, you must install it using make in the > ports tree. Why is that? Is a ports tree install preferred in the case > where you can do either? > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message