From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri May 24 18:56:55 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA27673 for hackers-outgoing; Fri, 24 May 1996 18:56:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: from parkplace.cet.co.jp (parkplace.cet.co.jp [202.32.64.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id SAA27668 for ; Fri, 24 May 1996 18:56:52 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (michaelh@localhost) by parkplace.cet.co.jp (8.7.5/CET-v2.1) with SMTP id KAA12139; Sat, 25 May 1996 10:56:41 +0900 (JST) Date: Sat, 25 May 1996 10:56:41 +0900 (JST) From: Michael Hancock To: Dennis cc: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: SDL cards In-Reply-To: <199605241621.MAA01179@etinc.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Fri, 24 May 1996, Dennis wrote: > >Granted. Ascends are very very nice. > > > >But there is no hack value. An ISDN-only solution using a P6 box with 3 > >busmastering SDLComm RISCom/Pri cards handling 69 incoming ISDN > >connections with STAC compression would be very cool. > > Yes and so would a molecular partical transporter :-) 69 B-channels at 64kpbs not 69 PRIs at 1.5Mbps. Is this more than rocket science? -mh