From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sun May 11 10:22:08 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 207D7ED7 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 10:22:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from plane.gmane.org (plane.gmane.org [80.91.229.3]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1CD1269E for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 10:22:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WjQtK-0001bu-3L for freebsd-ports@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 May 2014 12:21:58 +0200 Received: from a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi ([91.154.115.217]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 12:21:58 +0200 Received: from rakuco by a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 11 May 2014 12:21:58 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org From: Raphael Kubo da Costa Subject: What should I replace @exec and @unexec with? Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 13:21:44 +0300 Lines: 6 Message-ID: <86iopck43r.fsf@orwell.Elisa> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: a91-154-115-217.elisa-laajakaista.fi User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix) Cancel-Lock: sha1:7dOkPo/Drc6QqI3Tq8R1OJil5gM= X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 May 2014 10:22:08 -0000 I was taking a look at the Porter's Handbook today and noticed that @exec and @unexec are considered deprecated, but I couldn't find out what should be used instead. Should all uses of @exec and @unexec be replaced with pkg-{un}install scripts in the future?