From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 28 01:35:30 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E17DC1065672; Wed, 28 May 2008 01:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (trang.nuxi.org [74.95.12.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8A6E48FC0A; Wed, 28 May 2008 01:35:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from obrien@NUXI.org) Received: from dragon.nuxi.org (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m4S1ZTWL097355; Tue, 27 May 2008 18:35:29 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.org) Received: (from obrien@localhost) by dragon.nuxi.org (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) id m4S1ZSLP097354; Tue, 27 May 2008 18:35:28 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from obrien) Date: Tue, 27 May 2008 18:35:28 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" To: Colin Percival Message-ID: <20080528013528.GA97270@dragon.NUXI.org> References: <200805261715.m4QHFZUK070554@repoman.freebsd.org> <20080526172717.GA93432@freebsd.org> <483AFE87.6020103@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <483AFE87.6020103@freebsd.org> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 8.0-CURRENT User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, Roman Divacky , Tim Kientzle , src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/cpio Makefile bsdcpio.1 cmdline.c config_freebsd.h cpio.c cpio.h cpio_platform.h err.c matching.c matching.h pathmatch.c pathmatch.h src/usr.bin/cpio/test Makefile main.c test.h test_0.c test_basic.c test_format_newc.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: obrien@freebsd.org List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2008 01:35:31 -0000 On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 11:16:39AM -0700, Colin Percival wrote: > I'm looking forward to when we can remove both GNU cpio and our current > pax implementation from the tree, I don't see a reason to remove pax from the tree. It is already BSDL'ed and is faster than libarchive based archivers. Please take this a request to not remove pax. -- -- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)