From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 24 06:29:02 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5974D106567E; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:29:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Received: from vps1.elischer.org (vps1.elischer.org [204.109.63.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D72D8FC1F; Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:29:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from julian-mac.elischer.org (home-nat.elischer.org [67.100.89.137]) (authenticated bits=0) by vps1.elischer.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p2O6SwGJ082080 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:29:00 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4D8AE4BC.4080900@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 23:29:16 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X 10.4; en-US; rv:1.9.2.15) Gecko/20110303 Thunderbird/3.1.9 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Albert Shih References: <20110322131435.GA5792@obspm.fr> <4D890905.9010000@freebsd.org> <20110323100504.GA8779@obspm.fr> In-Reply-To: <20110323100504.GA8779@obspm.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, freebsd-jail@freebsd.org Subject: Re: setfib mount X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Mar 2011 06:29:02 -0000 On 3/23/11 3:05 AM, Albert Shih wrote: > Le 22/03/2011 à 13:39:33-0700, Julian Elischer a écrit >> On 3/22/11 6:14 AM, Albert Shih wrote: >>> Hi all >>> >>> Sorry for the cross-posting. I don't known which list is the best. >>> >>> I'm using freebsd-jail since 5.x and yesterday I upgrading (from 7.3 to >>> 7.4). >>> >>> I've see the setfib working now pretty well with the jail. So I using two >>> routing table. One for the host, one for the jails. >>> >>> But I don't known why the NFS mount (on the host of course) didn't use the >>> 0 routing table. So when I try to execute the mount the connection start >>> from the second interface. If I do >>> >>> setfib 0 mount >>> >>> every thing work fine. >>> ssh vps1 >> does your jail mount anything? >> > No. > > The mount is on the host. so then I too am not sure why the mount itself would use the second FIB. is it possible that some of the mounting is being done automatically by rc scripts using /etc/fstab in the jail? > Regards. > > JAS