From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Nov 18 03:48:13 1995 Return-Path: owner-ports Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id DAA16887 for ports-outgoing; Sat, 18 Nov 1995 03:48:13 -0800 Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [192.216.222.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id DAA16878 for ; Sat, 18 Nov 1995 03:48:06 -0800 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id DAA08950; Sat, 18 Nov 1995 03:46:32 -0800 To: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de (Joerg Wunsch) cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Proposal 1: category name changes In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 18 Nov 1995 12:12:15 +0100." <199511181112.MAA20976@uriah.heep.sax.de> Date: Sat, 18 Nov 1995 03:46:31 -0800 Message-ID: <8948.816695191@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-ports@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > As Satoshi Asami wrote: > > > > I would like to propose that all the category names for packages be > > changed to match those of subdirectories (e.g., "networking" -> > > "net"). You won't believe how many times I had to go delete the > > "utils" or "net" or "emulators" subdirectory in the packages dir. > > Fully agreed! I agree also. Not having the category names match the dirs was not one of my better ideas. Though I'd almost be motivated to vote that the change go in the other direction (long directory names) and just deal with the CVS pain and the shouts of the 8.3 weenies who were %@*$!'d on the directory names a long time ago anyway.. :) Jordan