From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 4 12:47:32 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 39E9B16A4E4; Wed, 4 May 2005 12:47:32 +0000 (GMT) Received: from gizm0.org (gizm0.org [212.114.209.25]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3065843D1F; Wed, 4 May 2005 12:47:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd@gizm0.org) Received: from [10.0.0.122] (unknown [10.0.0.122]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gizm0.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C7DCA10196; Wed, 4 May 2005 14:47:06 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4278C452.8070504@gizm0.org> Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 14:47:14 +0200 From: Steven Enderle User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.5) Gecko/20050203 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Fafa Hafiz Krantz References: <20050504115056.CA4A54BEAE@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> In-Reply-To: <20050504115056.CA4A54BEAE@ws1-1.us4.outblaze.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.1 cc: dev@freebsd.org cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: A make world/kernel interface? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 May 2005 12:47:32 -0000 Nice idea, but basicly its all included: 2. you can guess that after doing it a couple of times 3. ctrl-z / fg does the trick -- ++ message delivered by gizm0.org ++ free webmail - imap, pop3, ssl secured Fafa Hafiz Krantz wrote: >Hello. > >Would it be a good idea having some sort of interface for >those who desire to have their system updating (make world and >kernel) made interactive? I am not talking a GUI here, but >something that can make it more convenient: > >1. Put the entire process under one roof. >2. Be able to see the completion percentage >3. Be able to halt/resume the process >4. I'm sure there would be many other upsides to this > >I hope somebody can turn this into something viable. > >Thanks! > >-- > >Fafa Hafiz Krantz > Senior Designer @ http://www.home.no/barbershop > Furious @ http://www.home.no/barbershop/smart/sharon.pdf > > > >