From owner-freebsd-hardware Wed Oct 1 02:36:19 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id CAA02082 for hardware-outgoing; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 02:36:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (vh1.gsoft.com.au [203.38.152.122]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA02076; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 02:36:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: from word.smith.net.au (localhost.gsoft.com.au [127.0.0.1]) by word.smith.net.au (8.8.7/8.8.5) with ESMTP id TAA01489; Wed, 1 Oct 1997 19:03:35 +0930 (CST) Message-Id: <199710010933.TAA01489@word.smith.net.au> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97 To: Mike Smith cc: questions@FreeBSD.ORG, hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ppbus problem In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 01 Oct 1997 17:44:14 +0930." <199710010814.RAA01249@word.smith.net.au> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 19:03:34 +0930 From: Mike Smith Sender: owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > Mime Version: 1.0 > > Content Type: Text Plain > > Date: Wed, 01 Oct 1997 02:35:00 -0400 > > From: User Gp I hope you're subscribed to one or both of these lists; that's not a valid mail address. > > ppc0 at 0x278 irq 7 on isa > > ppc0: Generic chipset in PS/2 mode > > plip0: on ppbus 0 > > ppi0: on ppbus 0 > > vpo0: on ppbus 0 > > scbus0 at vpo0 bus 0 > > sd0 at scbus0 target 6 lun 0 > > sd0: type 0 removable SCSI 2 > > sd0: Direct-Access > > sd0: UNIT ATTENTION asc:28,0 > > sd0: Not ready to ready transition, medium may have changed > > 862MB (196608 4592 byte sectors) > > vpo0: on ppbus 0 > > scbus1 at vpo0 bus 0 > > sd1 at scbus1 target 6 lun 0 > > sd1: type 0 removable SCSI 2 > > sd1: Direct-Access > > sd1: ILLEGAL REQUEST asc:24,0 Invalid field in CDB > > sd1 could not mode sense (4). Using ficticious geometry > > 96MB (196608 512 byte sectors) > > Actually, this looks pretty ugly; you appear to have detected the vpo0 > device twice. Do you have one Zip or two connected? I've been trying to work out how you could actually have achieved this at all. Are you using the ppbus code in -current, or a patched 2.2? (Sorry, I nuked your previous message 8( ) mike