From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Oct 3 10:23:21 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDB416A4BF for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 10:23:21 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail.liwing.de (mail.liwing.de [213.70.188.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADA4D43FE0 for ; Fri, 3 Oct 2003 10:23:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from rehsack@liwing.de) Received: (qmail 62319 invoked from network); 3 Oct 2003 17:23:14 -0000 Received: from stingray.liwing.de (HELO liwing.de) ([213.70.188.164]) (envelope-sender ) by mail.liwing.de (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 3 Oct 2003 17:23:14 -0000 Message-ID: <3F7DB082.2030403@liwing.de> Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:23:14 +0000 From: Jens Rehsack User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030928 X-Accept-Language: de-de, de, en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Bill Moran References: <200310022051.h92Kp6N1039873@gw.catspoiler.org> <3F7DA56D.8070002@liwing.de> <3F7DADAD.207@potentialtech.com> In-Reply-To: <3F7DADAD.207@potentialtech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: Don Lewis cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Improvements to fsck performance in -current ...? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Oct 2003 17:23:21 -0000 Bill Moran wrote: [...] > To me, this means: > a) if you want reliable, don't use IDE with WC Reducable of 'don't use IDE' :-) > b) if you want reliable and fast, don't use IDE, period, use SCSI. If you look at the recent postings, SCSI didn't help you out everytime. I use the fileserver in current configuration for nearly 5 years, and only once this happend, each other case all filesystems including hold data was recoverable. Jens