From owner-freebsd-ppc@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 14 22:00:55 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4500A16A4CE; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ns1.xcllnt.net (209-128-86-226.BAYAREA.NET [209.128.86.226]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 275F843D1D; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net [192.168.4.201]) by ns1.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i1F60sOE006477; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@piii.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: from dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) i1F60rcM062888; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net) Received: (from marcel@localhost) by dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i1F60nU7062887; Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from marcel) Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2004 22:00:47 -0800 From: Marcel Moolenaar To: Garance A Drosihn Message-ID: <20040215060047.GA62840@dhcp01.pn.xcllnt.net> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i cc: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org cc: sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Back to the Future - 64-bit time_t on sparc64 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ppc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the PowerPC List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 06:00:55 -0000 On Fri, Feb 13, 2004 at 10:53:00PM -0500, Garance A Drosihn wrote: > > Adventurous people are invited to try this for installs on any > system, and let me know how it goes No problems. It's actually very painless. The "mergemaster -p" is probably a bit too much, as well as the second mergemaster provided that the machine has been upgraded prior to starting the 64-bit time_t transition. Also, the first "shutdown -r" can probably be a reboot. In any case: good job! -- Marcel Moolenaar USPA: A-39004 marcel@xcllnt.net