From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Apr 11 22:30:15 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8208916A400; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (tim.des.no [194.63.250.121]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 444C913C45B; Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:30:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from des@des.no) Received: from tim.des.no (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spam.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id 375DA2090; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:30:09 +0200 (CEST) X-Spam-Tests: AWL X-Spam-Learn: disabled X-Spam-Score: 0.0/3.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.7 (2006-10-05) on tim.des.no Received: from dwp.des.no (des.no [80.203.243.180]) by smtp.des.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1B762081; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:30:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: by dwp.des.no (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 9C852A1089; Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:30:08 +0200 (CEST) From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?=) To: ticso@cicely.de References: <20070406025700.GB98545@garage.freebsd.pl> <86k5wo55s0.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070407203411.GJ8831@cicely12.cicely.de> <86wt0n3mxv.fsf@dwp.des.no> <20070411214911.GA38351@VARK.MIT.EDU> Date: Thu, 12 Apr 2007 00:30:08 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20070411214911.GA38351@VARK.MIT.EDU> (David Schultz's message of "Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:49:11 -0400") Message-ID: <86fy764k9b.fsf@dwp.des.no> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.3 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-fs@FreeBSD.ORG, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Pawel Jakub Dawidek Subject: Re: ZFS committed to the FreeBSD base. X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 11 Apr 2007 22:30:15 -0000 David Schultz writes: > Any ideas how ZFS and GEOM are going to work out, given that ZFS > is designed to be the filesystem + volume manager in one? Pawel has seveal years' experience writing GEOM classes, and ZFS plays along nicely with GEOM. You can create zpools on any kind of GEOM provider, and attach any kind of GEOM consumer to zvols. DES --=20 Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no