From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 3 19:04:38 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 685BF1065670 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:04:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dougb@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail2.fluidhosting.com (mx21.fluidhosting.com [204.14.89.4]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1028FC18 for ; Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:04:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 27123 invoked by uid 399); 3 Oct 2009 19:04:37 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO foreign.dougb.net) (dougb@dougbarton.us@127.0.0.1) by localhost with ESMTPAM; 3 Oct 2009 19:04:37 -0000 X-Originating-IP: 127.0.0.1 X-Sender: dougb@dougbarton.us Message-ID: <4AC7A043.6030404@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 12:04:35 -0700 From: Doug Barton Organization: http://www.FreeBSD.org/ User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090822) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kamigishi Rei References: <4AC61ED6.1090802@haruhiism.net> <20091002191255.J26486@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net> <4AC79ED2.5060507@haruhiism.net> In-Reply-To: <4AC79ED2.5060507@haruhiism.net> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 OpenPGP: id=D5B2F0FB Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" , FreeBSD-Current Subject: Re: Another panic (during netisr?) X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2009 19:04:38 -0000 Kamigishi Rei wrote: > I've replaced the CPU in the server (was: dual core, now: quad core) for > even more chances for a race condition to strike; waiting for this one > to re-appear again now on 8.0-RC1 ;) (Though 39 days of uptime was a > pretty good result for BETA3, I can't say I'm satisfied, as I have yet > to see my 7.2-STABLE server panic; 39 days is not impressive when it > comes to production use including running ircd for a large network.) As a former IRC server operator I completely agree with you. :) However this is why testing of the sort that you are doing is SO critical to the success of a new release. Please accept our sincere gratitude for the testing, feedback, and testing of new patches. Without users like you we would not be even a fraction as successful as we have been to date. Doug -- This .signature sanitized for your protection