From owner-freebsd-questions Sat Dec 17 14:15:36 1994 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id OAA18682 for questions-outgoing; Sat, 17 Dec 1994 14:15:36 -0800 Received: from post.demon.co.uk (post.demon.co.uk [158.152.1.72]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) with SMTP id OAA18674; Sat, 17 Dec 1994 14:15:28 -0800 Received: from palmer.demon.co.uk by post.demon.co.uk id aa10208; 17 Dec 94 22:15 GMT Received: (from gary@localhost) by palmer.demon.co.uk (8.6.9/8.6.9) id WAA01254; Sat, 17 Dec 1994 22:14:39 GMT From: Gary Palmer Message-Id: <199412172214.WAA01254@palmer.demon.co.uk> Subject: Re: Tripwire for FreeBSD 2.0? To: Matt Midboe Date: Sat, 17 Dec 1994 22:14:38 +0000 (WET) Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, freebsd-security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: <199412172201.QAA07908@magellan.iquest.com> from "Matt Midboe" at Dec 17, 94 04:01:26 pm X-OS: FreeBSD 2.1.0-Development X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL22] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 859 Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk > I'm curious if anyone has gotten Tripwire 1.1 to make it through the > tests on FreeBSD 2.0. It makes just fine for me, but when I go to run it > through the tests it fails at the first one. It says "Expecting 0 got 8" > most specifically. I noticed when I compiled I got some warnings from > endian.h, so is this a byte ordering problem? Can you be more specific about the warnings? Knowing various packages hate of system defaults (especially the system defined endianess), it wouldn't surprise me to find that you have to change a byte sex parameter in one of the .h files. I'll check to see if I have this locally, if so I'll have a quick `look-see'. Gary -- FreeBSD/ARM (ArchBSD) Core Member FreeBSD/ARM - 4.4BSD-Lite for the Acorn RISC platforms E-Mail: gary@palmer.demon.co.uk, gpalmer@FreeBSD.org WWW Pages: http://www.FreeBSD.org/~gpalmer/