From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 9 21:10:06 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 15C691065674 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 21:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 095068FC17 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 21:10:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m89LA5BM011349 for ; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 21:10:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.2/8.14.1/Submit) id m89LA5BR011348; Tue, 9 Sep 2008 21:10:05 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 21:10:05 GMT Message-Id: <200809092110.m89LA5BR011348@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Scott Kleihege Cc: Subject: Re: ports/127089: sysutils/heartbeat does not compile X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Scott Kleihege List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 Sep 2008 21:10:06 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/127089; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Scott Kleihege To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: ports/127089: sysutils/heartbeat does not compile Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 15:00:17 -0600 On Thu, Sep 04, 2008 at 10:49:52PM +0000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: >Maintainer of sysutils/heartbeat, > >Please note that PR ports/127089 has just been submitted. > >If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix >you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch >and a committer will take care of it. > >The full text of the PR can be found at: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/127089 This fix would make a great patch, and hopefully resolve two other PRs about this issue. I would approve such a patch to the port. -- Regards, tummy.com, ltd Scott Kleihege Linux Consulting since 1995 http://www.tummy.com/