From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Aug 26 23:30:06 2013
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 846071BE;
 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:30:06 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com)
Received: from mail-qc0-x22c.google.com (mail-qc0-x22c.google.com
 [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::22c])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 00AFC28E3;
 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:30:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mail-qc0-f172.google.com with SMTP id a1so2173567qcx.31
 for <multiple recipients>; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
 h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject
 :from:to:cc:content-type;
 bh=PjAtJXlrewkZ3Vaflw80IOGnnmAuRAJ0xiqdsy8g1hw=;
 b=YYgq+xPMVnCMyiMDmvOJmetxgcC0NXZW0VCahrdDtcfBnrh9RnM6t9GLWOJZA8AI6+
 M6yh6uTx4WVOjgH0df/Thtzj/nahqHLf2de3BalL9EqEOG7iBMnfZvMw1hznyxHXhZUU
 cZ8lRQlsUy7WHqGTg3r1vOPhmMzri8ZnweHkDBXFc/ENMoj+wRWPxZiBUfvCYYUjyaBq
 ZcKLfB63dYzh5LLgTd/AI6oMptv826NCb6ydDg6gQNLgM/r7xM3VCCDw/Qp5nsEnCTZm
 GJX6ppm+hdltn17GtH1Lj/l+LqNEdMkXUv6Ng5tqHL77N88KA+p4+nSFhDYqlYu/JvX2
 WIAA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.166.129 with SMTP id m1mr18952146qay.46.1377559805194;
 Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com
Received: by 10.224.128.70 with HTTP; Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:30:05 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <521BBD21.4070304@freebsd.org>
References: <D01A0CB2-B1E3-4F4B-97FA-4C821C0E3FD2@FreeBSD.org>
 <521BBD21.4070304@freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 16:30:05 -0700
X-Google-Sender-Auth: ZViB53TuZ52B82R6Y-XGm7gykB0
Message-ID: <CAJ-Vmom8TppCc1+io53cCct17NV=7x374zfE7Zq1ShSZ72bufA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Flow ID, LACP, and igb
From: Adrian Chadd <adrian@freebsd.org>
To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14
Cc: Jack F Vogel <jfv@freebsd.org>, "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@freebsd.org>,
 Alan Somers <asomers@freebsd.org>, "net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2013 23:30:06 -0000

... is there any reason we wouldn't want to have the TX and RX for a given
flow mapped to the same core?




-adrian