From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Mar 10 5:45:48 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from dns.ie-online.it (dns.ie-online.it [194.133.148.8]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50060150E4 for ; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 05:45:37 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sriva@alice.it) Received: from dns.ie-interna.it (host1.ie-online.it [194.133.148.10]) by dns.ie-online.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id OAA22953; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:45:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sriva@alice.it) Received: from stefano (stefano.ie-interna.it [192.168.0.33]) by dns.ie-interna.it (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA09289; Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:45:17 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from sriva@alice.it) Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990310144516.00acfb90@relay.alice.it> X-Sender: riva@relay.alice.it X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 14:45:16 +0100 To: Brendan Kosowski , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG From: Stefano Riva Subject: Re: Last release of FreeBSD 2.x.x ??? In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG At 23.39 10/03/99 +1100, you wrote: >Is FreeBSD 2.2.8 the last release of FreeBSD version 2 ? Yes. >Should I get a copy of 2.2.8 before it dissapears, or should I just get >FreeBSD 3.1 ? It depends. If you want the most solid version and you aren't interested in 3.x enhancements, then you should get 2.2.8. If you want the most modern version and/or you need 3.x ehancements, then you should get 3.1. Anyway, link the STABLE tree. --- Stefano Riva Software Engineer - Systems Administrator Informazioni Editoriali I.E. Srl Phone +39-027528400, Fax +39-027528451 Email sriva@alice.it To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message