From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Aug 4 13:09:36 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66ADC16A4CE; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:09:36 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pooker.samsco.org (pooker.samsco.org [168.103.85.57]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 163BC43D5F; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 13:09:36 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.0.12] (g4.samsco.home [192.168.0.12]) (authenticated bits=0) by pooker.samsco.org (8.12.11/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i74D8b96001617; Wed, 4 Aug 2004 07:08:38 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from scottl@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4110DFC7.8000200@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 07:08:23 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X Mach-O; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Steve O'Hara-Smith" References: <200408040743.i747hs3m000419@pooker.samsco.org> <20040804102101.5e0f4023.steve@sohara.org> In-Reply-To: <20040804102101.5e0f4023.steve@sohara.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=3.8 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.63 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.63 (2004-01-11) on pooker.samsco.org cc: re@freebsd.org cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 5.3-RELEASE TODO X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 04 Aug 2004 13:09:36 -0000 Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Wed, 4 Aug 2004 01:43:54 -0600 (MDT) > Scott Long wrote: > > >> | Source upgrade | Not done | David Schultz | problematic. The | >> | incompatibility | | | 5.3 world sources | >> | | | | must be buildable | >> | | | | and installable | >> | | | | from a 5.2.1 | >> | | | | system. | > > > Should they not also be buildable and installable from a 4.10 or 4.11 system > in order to preserve the -stable upgrade route ? > This would be good, yes, but there are so many other gotchas with that upgrade path that I don't consider it a show-stopper for it not to work. Once the 5.2 -> 5.3 path is fixed, then we can focus on 4.x -> 5.3 path. Scott