From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Dec 11 16:39:46 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 100511065676 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:39:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nwhitehorn@freebsd.org) Received: from argol.doit.wisc.edu (argol.doit.wisc.edu [144.92.197.212]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8BCE8FC14 for ; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:39:44 +0000 (UTC) MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII; format=flowed Received: from avs-daemon.smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) id <0LW100600SY7OV00@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu> for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:39:43 -0600 (CST) Received: from comporellon.tachypleus.net ([unknown] [76.210.61.201]) by smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0LW1005NJSY63I00@smtpauth3.wiscmail.wisc.edu>; Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:39:42 -0600 (CST) Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 10:39:41 -0600 From: Nathan Whitehorn In-reply-to: <201112111439.pBBEdXVI064559@fire.js.berklix.net> To: "Julian H. Stacey" Message-id: <4EE4DCCD.9090401@freebsd.org> X-Spam-Report: AuthenticatedSender=yes, SenderIP=76.210.61.201 X-Spam-PmxInfo: Server=avs-12, Version=5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2011.12.11.162715, SenderIP=76.210.61.201 References: <201112111439.pBBEdXVI064559@fire.js.berklix.net> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:8.0) Gecko/20111113 Thunderbird/8.0 Cc: giffunip@tutopia.com, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CVS removal from the base X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Dec 2011 16:39:46 -0000 On 12/11/11 08:39, Julian H. Stacey wrote: > "Pedro F. Giffuni" wrote: >> Hi Daniel; >> >> --- On Sat, 12/3/11, Daniel Eischen wrote: >> ... >>> I would love to mirror the SVN repo in the same way >>> and have an 'svn' in base, or at least something that >>> could replace CVS in the above scenario. >>> >> I have to say I am surprised by all the people that >> still use CVS (for their own good reasons). >> >> It still would be helpful if cvs users could evaluate >> OpenCVS: it's been experimental for ages now. It does >> seem to have some advantage (other than the license) >> in that it's smaller and better maintained (or at >> least not too dead). > Did you test it with > cd /usr/src/release ; make release > > Cheers, > Julian For whatever it's worth, release(7) uses svn for src by default these days. -Nathan