From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 16 08:54:56 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B9D4106566B; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:54:56 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gabor@FreeBSD.org) Received: from server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [87.229.73.95]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E8FC8FC08; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:54:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from server.mypc.hu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EA3C14E815D; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 10:54:55 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at server.mypc.hu Received: from server.mypc.hu ([127.0.0.1]) by server.mypc.hu (server.mypc.hu [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id ccbrmwQGMVTy; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 10:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (D94162B4.catv.pool.telekom.hu [217.65.98.180]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by server.mypc.hu (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B17F014E815C; Sun, 16 Sep 2012 10:54:54 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <505593E2.8040402@FreeBSD.org> Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 10:54:58 +0200 From: Gabor Kovesdan User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:14.0) Gecko/20120713 Thunderbird/14.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: imp@FreeBSD.org X-Enigmail-Version: 1.4.4 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: FBSD Doc project Subject: hats article X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Sep 2012 08:54:56 -0000 Hi Warner, on doc@ and www@ we are talking about cleaning up old content. Your hats article came into focus because it seems very short for an article and imo it is too general and explains things that one should know by common sense and some of such information is also included in committers-guide. One alternative suggestion was to move the content to internal/ instead of simply removing. As the author of the article, we would like to hear your opinion on this. Thanks, Gabor