From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Feb 13 16:21:59 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from puyu.time.net.my (pop.time.net.my [203.121.16.80]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA9E837B4EC for ; Tue, 13 Feb 2001 16:21:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from time.net.my ([203.121.16.89]) by puyu.time.net.my (Netscape Messaging Server 4.15) with ESMTP id G8Q0VT00.JUV for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 08:19:05 +0800 From: "Ariff Abdullah" To: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <54e050ea.50ea54e0@time.net.my> Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 08:22:34 +0800 X-Mailer: Netscape Webmail MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Language: en Subject: apache+mod_perl+eperl , cgi X-Accept-Language: en Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Hello. Guys , which one do you prefer (in terms of performance AND stability) 1) apache+mod_perl, executing cgi internally using the modperl DSO 2) apache, executing plain cgi (err.. of course it spawning new proccess) 3) or perhaps, apache+mod_perl+ePerl (security not an issue, since this is just an internal http for private net) any insight? cheers. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message