From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 6 16:11:56 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 76E6616A4F0 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:11:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ganymede.hub.org (u46n208.hfx.eastlink.ca [24.222.46.208]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC1843D41 for ; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 16:11:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from scrappy@hub.org) Received: by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 124F437593; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:08:21 -0400 (AST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ganymede.hub.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F7EE372EB; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:08:21 -0400 (AST) Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 20:08:21 -0400 (AST) From: "Marc G. Fournier" To: Zoran Kikic In-Reply-To: <19B481CA418DC04CA76EEF2B90B905F10331B9@srv-mail.magic-garden.local> Message-ID: <20040106200657.G69880@ganymede.hub.org> References: <19B481CA418DC04CA76EEF2B90B905F10331B9@srv-mail.magic-garden.local> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports confusion - are they configurable like I want? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jan 2004 00:11:56 -0000 On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Zoran Kikic wrote: > hi, > > I build my apache from source and it runs wonderful on fbsd 5.1. > Now I tried to do the same with the fbsd apache-port but I > have no idea how to install the port with the same(exact) configuration > arguments I used for my source build: > > ./configure --enable-layout=xyz --enable-file-cache --enable-cache > --enable-deflate \ > --enable-proxy --enable-bucketeer --enable-module=so --with-mpm=worker \ > --enable-mods-shared=all --enable-logio --enable-ssl=shared > --with-ssl-dir=/usr/local/ssl > > I realized the knobs an CONFIGURE_ARGS in Makefile but I still don't > know how > to proceed... I found many hints about this but nobody shows any > samples. One thing that should work is if you put a: CONFIGURE_ARGS= right after the last CONFIGURE_ARGS+= in the Makefile ... the ARGS+= adds arguments, but if you say ARGS=, it will wipe out the previous settings and force it "your way" ... The thing is, there are alot of other defines in the Makefile that may/maynot be what you want, so just CONFIGURE_ARGS doesn't quite do it :( ---- Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services (http://www.hub.org) Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy ICQ: 7615664