From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Feb 17 12:36:26 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from revolution.3-cities.com (revolution.3-cities.com [204.203.224.155]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9E59C112DE for ; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 12:36:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kstewart@3-cities.com) Received: from 3-cities.com (kenn1200.bossig.com [208.26.241.200]) by revolution.3-cities.com (8.8.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id MAA12206; Wed, 17 Feb 1999 12:36:09 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <36CB283F.73000E21@3-cities.com> Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 12:36:15 -0800 From: Kent Stewart Organization: Columbia Basin Virtual Community Project X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (WinNT; U) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Thomas Stephens Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ksh93? References: <199902170928.JAA23681@stephens.ml.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG I am using the version that came on the Walnut Creek CDROM's. I was talking to the person that got me to try fbsd and he had me type something to set it up and change shells. It seems like it was already installed and all I had to do was chsh. I never had to look up anything and that doesn't leave you with memories in a week much less the four that have elapsed since I switched. It was in some wierd location like /usr/local/ksh or something. I can't look up anything because I am replacing a Pentium 200Mhz Windows NT machine with a 400Mhz P-II and had to use the monitor on the FreeBSD system to do it. It has problems and getting them resolved has priority. The trickle down will end up with a faster computer running fbsd. I use vi as my command line editor from FreeBSD and MSDOS to NT. We didn't have anything like Emacs on the Cray or HP's and I got used to it. Vi was considered a resource hog and emacs didn't stand a chance. Kent Thomas Stephens wrote: > > Kent Stewart wrote: > >I use ksh on FreeBSD for everything but root access. I like the file > >completion option as that user. > > Are you using pdksh from the ports collection, or some other version? > > You can actually use file completion with ksh. In vi mode (set -o vi), > type to go into command mode and then = and \ to list and complete, > respectively. In emacs mode (set -o emacs) type = to list (the > same as vi mode) and to complete. > > It's possible to change the keybindings if you want to use a different > sequence (such as ) for completion, but there are differences > between ksh93, pdksh, etc. > > Thomas Stephens > tas@stephens.org -- Kent Stewart Richland, WA mailto:kstewart@3-cities.com http://www.3-cities.com/~kstewart/index.html To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message