From owner-freebsd-stable Fri Nov 17 9:41:36 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mail.hiwaay.net (fly.HiWAAY.net [208.147.154.56]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E6B37B479 for ; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:41:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from bonsai.knology.net (user-24-214-88-8.knology.net [24.214.88.8]) by mail.hiwaay.net (8.11.0/8.11.0) with ESMTP id eAHHfM719407; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:41:22 -0600 (CST) Received: (from steve@localhost) by bonsai.knology.net (8.11.0/8.9.3) id eAHHfCf87285; Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:41:12 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from steve) Date: Fri, 17 Nov 2000 11:39:19 -0600 From: Steve Price To: Blaz Zupan Cc: Panagiotis Astithas , stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 4.2-BETA hangs on boot Message-ID: <20001117113919.L62344@bonsai.knology.net> References: <20001117112350.B77800@netmode.ece.ntua.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from blaz@amis.net on Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 04:40:42PM +0100 X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.0-CURRENT i386 Sender: owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Fri, Nov 17, 2000 at 04:40:42PM +0100, Blaz Zupan wrote: # > OTOH most laptops today have so many accessories that irqs are a very # > scarce resource. It seems that usually some other device needs irq 10. # > That's why the change was made in the first place. # # Sure, but I don't quite understand why it says "irq 0". Is that the same as # leaving the "irq" part out alltogether? The best I can tell it puts pcic in polling mode. I could be wrong. :) -steve To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message