From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Nov 2 23:46:20 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5BC2F16A4CE for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:46:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (CPE0050040655c8-CM00111ae02aac.cpe.net.cable.rogers.com [69.194.102.143]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 328D643D41 for ; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 23:46:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kris@obsecurity.org) Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id AEA9C54CEC; Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:48:21 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 15:48:21 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Kirk Strauser Message-ID: <20041102234821.GA76782@xor.obsecurity.org> References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> <200411021736.21034.kirk@strauser.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200411021736.21034.kirk@strauser.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 02 Nov 2004 23:46:20 -0000 --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 02, 2004 at 05:36:17PM -0600, Kirk Strauser wrote: > On Tuesday 02 November 2004 16:20, Kris Kennaway wrote: >=20 > > (there are at least 350 ports that emit warnings about aliasing, and wo= uld > > probably have runtime errors when compiled with -O2; moreover, a number= of > > ports fail to even build with -O2). =20 >=20 > Out of curiosity, are those ports like to have equivalents in Gentoo's=20 > "portage" system? Those guys love to build with -O310 -fomit-instruction= s=20 > but their stuff seems to pretty much work. Why do we seem to have so man= y=20 > problems with (presumably?) the same software on our system? Don't know, perhaps they don't care about the fraction of ports that don't work properly since the rest of them have such eleet optimization. Kris --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFBiBzFWry0BWjoQKURAvDzAJwKu0s1Tm/SvSTCQKIaY2asg2ULpgCgiSiV XjJ3srgV5lJ6ZKIrrnxLunA= =/GTh -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --sdtB3X0nJg68CQEu--