From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 18 00:08:06 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 33272E3C
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:08:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from be-well.ilk.org (be-well.ilk.org [23.30.133.173])
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0975A2DF5
 for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:08:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from lowell-desk.lan (lowell-desk.lan [172.30.250.41])
 by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A36833C1E;
 Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: by lowell-desk.lan (Postfix, from userid 1147)
 id 32BDB39816; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:57 -0400 (EDT)
From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org>
To: tyler@tysdomain.com
Subject: Re: periodic: condensing mails
References: <53A09B63.50805@tysdomain.com>
Reply-To: "freebsd-questions\@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:56 -0400
In-Reply-To: <53A09B63.50805@tysdomain.com> (Tyler Littlefield's message of
 "Tue, 17 Jun 2014 15:47:47 -0400")
Message-ID: <447g4ff5b7.fsf@lowell-desk.lan>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (berkeley-unix)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 00:08:06 -0000

"Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> writes:

> I was reading this article:
> http://deranfangvomende.wordpress.com/2014/05/11/freebsd-periodic-mails-v=
s-monitoring/
> where it mentions this:
> I found turning off certain things like the =93security mail=94 also
> disables portaudit DB updates. But I just changed my portaudit call to
> include the download.
> Somehow I had assumed that *update* would be separate from *report*.
> Is this still an issue? If so, how have people fixed it? I'm looking
> at condensing this (I'm dumping all failed ssh logins into a
> blacklist, so I don't need to know about them). I get a lot of
> material and sometimes it's a ton to read through.

I'm really not clear on what you're doing exactly.=20
Maybe what you're looking for is daily_status_security_inline
rather than disabling specific checks?