From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 26 14:41:42 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F128F16A419 for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: from asgard1.americatelsal.com (asgard.americatelsal.com [200.13.161.7]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BC8313C45D for ; Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:41:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mmiranda@123.com.sv) Received: (qmail 30094 invoked from network); 26 Jul 2007 14:40:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO ?192.168.10.124?) (200.13.161.68) by asgard1.americatelsal.com with SMTP; 26 Jul 2007 14:40:56 -0000 Message-ID: <46A8B49C.6070903@123.com.sv> Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 08:50:04 -0600 From: Miguel User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (Windows/20070716) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org CC: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <46A7E417.5040800@123.com.sv> <46A8144C.7010503@crackmonkey.us> In-Reply-To: <46A8144C.7010503@crackmonkey.us> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Subject: Re: porteasy vs portupgrade X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Jul 2007 14:41:43 -0000 Adam J Richardson escribió: > Miguel wrote: >> Hi, i used to use portupgrade as using this instructions >> http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/bsd/2001/11/29/Big_Scary_Daemons.html >> for doing all the port managing, what about porteasy, it is as good >> as portupgrade? >> i think porteasy is not as popular as portupgrade. >> thanks > > Hi Miguel, > > I use portupgrade and portsnap, a combination which seems to work > fine. The only thing that annoys me about portupgrade is that it's > written in Ruby, and when it's time for an upgrade I always have to > upgrade the Ruby compiler as well. Upgrading Ruby just takes forever > on these old battered beige boxes. > you are absolutly right, portsnap + portupgrade, thakns