From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Jan 19 6:17:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from axl.noc.iafrica.com (axl.noc.iafrica.com [196.31.1.175]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9A5715066 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 06:17:33 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sheldonh@axl.noc.iafrica.com) Received: from sheldonh (helo=axl.noc.iafrica.com) by axl.noc.iafrica.com with local-esmtp (Exim 3.11 #1) id 12Avty-0001cT-00; Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:16:02 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: ATAPI In-reply-to: Your message of "Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:21:22 +0600." Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2000 16:16:02 +0200 Message-ID: <6228.948291362@axl.noc.iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 19 Jan 2000 18:21:22 +0600, "Alexey N. Dokuchaev" wrote: > In LINT they say that to have ATAPI support (for CDROM), I have to have > these lines (among others): > > options ATAPI # Enable ATAPI support for IDE bus > options ATAPI_STATIC # Don't do it as an LKM > > So, that's in case I want to have ATAPI support compiled into kernel. And > if I want it be kernel module? There's not much point in doing it as a module, since a CDROM isn't something you spend your life plugging in and unplugging. :-) > Should I live ATAPI on, or I can get rid > of both of them? Leave 'em both in. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message