From owner-freebsd-smp  Thu Feb 15 17:21:23 2001
Delivered-To: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Received: from sharmas.dhs.org (c62443-a.frmt1.sfba.home.com [24.0.69.165])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44DDE37B491
	for <freebsd-smp@freebsd.org>; Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:21:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: (from adsharma@localhost)
	by sharmas.dhs.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) id RAA08029;
	Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:20:15 -0800
Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2001 17:20:15 -0800
From: Arun Sharma <adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org>
Message-Id: <200102160120.RAA08029@sharmas.dhs.org>
To: frussell@p1.cs.ohiou.edu
Cc: freebsd-smp@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: possible problem with SMP?
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010214142231.6504A-100000@p1>
References: <Pine.GSO.3.96.1010214142231.6504A-100000@p1>
Reply-To: adsharma@sharmas.dhs.org
Sender: owner-freebsd-smp@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On 14 Feb 2001 20:31:40 +0100, Russell Francis <frussell@p1.cs.ohiou.edu> wrote:
> Something that puzzles me is that xosview  only displays the stats
> for one processor

I sent patches for this (both xosview and per CPU sysctls) last year, but
no one responded. I'd agree that there is a value to keeping the commit
privileges to a few "commiters". But I find the fact that patches posted
to the list go unanswered/ignored discouraging for new contributors and
when it happens repeatedly, a bit insulting too.

Now, I'm not motivated to do anything for FreeBSD.

	-Arun


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-smp" in the body of the message