From owner-freebsd-x11@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 14 10:25:06 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4E06106566B for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from gizmo.2hip.net (gizmo.2hip.net [64.74.207.195]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950FA8FC20 for ; Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:25:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) Received: from [192.168.1.4] (adsl-154-199-204.ard.bellsouth.net [72.154.199.204]) (authenticated bits=0) by gizmo.2hip.net (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6EAP40A068031 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 14 Jul 2009 06:25:04 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from rnoland@FreeBSD.org) From: Robert Noland To: jw In-Reply-To: References: <4A5AA977.8080200@halplant.com> <1247497763.1745.11.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg="pgp-sha1"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-LjqzgbQWzW0qAOgGloMK" Organization: FreeBSD Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 05:24:58 -0500 Message-Id: <1247567099.1745.15.camel@balrog.2hip.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Evolution 2.26.2 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_PBL, RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL, RDNS_DYNAMIC, SPF_SOFTFAIL autolearn=no version=3.2.5 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.5 (2008-06-10) on gizmo.2hip.net Cc: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Problem with VESA and 1680x1050 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Jul 2009 10:25:07 -0000 --=-LjqzgbQWzW0qAOgGloMK Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, 2009-07-13 at 22:58 -0700, jw wrote: > On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 8:09 AM, Robert Noland wrote= : > > > > You can try nouveau with and/or without my kernel patch for drm support= . > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/drm-nouveau-043009.patch > > > > which should work with the current ports of libdrm and > > xf86-video-nouveau. > > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~rnoland/drm-nouveau-062309.patch > > > > should work with libdrm and nouveau from git. IGP chips should be > > supported. I would be interested to hear reports of success or failure > > either way. > > >=20 > Thanks - I'll give it a shot when I have a chance - does that support > 64bit? (forgot to mention that in my original mail) Yes, my test boxes are amd64. robert. > -John --=20 Robert Noland FreeBSD --=-LjqzgbQWzW0qAOgGloMK Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (FreeBSD) iEYEABECAAYFAkpcXPoACgkQM4TrQ4qfROPyBQCfadXPoxaPeSTsVPqTHhZ9IYtT KQEAnAg+COZg7GaR3A8La5QS+KRKHMg0 =o22B -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-LjqzgbQWzW0qAOgGloMK--