From owner-freebsd-virtualization@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 18 09:50:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FDC727C; Sat, 18 May 2013 09:50:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from roger.pau@citrix.com) Received: from SMTP.EU.CITRIX.COM (smtp.eu.citrix.com [46.33.159.39]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9CBD9DC; Sat, 18 May 2013 09:50:12 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,699,1363132800"; d="scan'208";a="4730943" Received: from lonpex01cl01.citrite.net ([10.30.203.101]) by LONPIPO01.EU.CITRIX.COM with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 18 May 2013 09:50:04 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.30] (10.30.203.1) by LONPEX01CL01.citrite.net (10.30.203.101) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.342.3; Sat, 18 May 2013 10:50:02 +0100 Message-ID: <51974EC9.9030204@citrix.com> Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 11:50:01 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=E9?= User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.7; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Colin Percival Subject: Re: FreeBSD PVHVM call for testing References: <519131D8.9010307@citrix.com> <51952BAE.6010609@freebsd.org> <51957D42.9060801@citrix.com> <51959ED9.6040405@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <51959ED9.6040405@freebsd.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.30.203.1] Cc: "freebsd-xen@freebsd.org" , xen-devel , "freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org" , "xen-users@lists.xen.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-virtualization@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Discussion of various virtualization techniques FreeBSD supports." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 18 May 2013 09:50:13 -0000 On 17/05/13 05:07, Colin Percival wrote: > On 05/16/13 17:43, Roger Pau Monné wrote: >> Thanks for testing this on EC2, could you post the full dmesg? So I can >> see the hypervisor version and if the PV timer is loaded or not. > > Here's what I get on a cc2.8xlarge with boot_verbose=YES: I've pushed a new branch to my repository, pvhvm_v7 that should work, there was a bug with PCI event channel interrupt set up. I've tested with 3.4 and seems OK, but of course it doesn't support the vector callback injection. Regards, Roger.