From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 16 10:58:13 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C7864327 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:58:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from dfr@rabson.org) Received: from mail-la0-x229.google.com (mail-la0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 14C533EA for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:58:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f41.google.com with SMTP id fo12so4183892lab.28 for ; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:58:12 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type:x-gm-message-state; bh=hAnhNqCryu8saD5JXokGpgmdDcMBXgYMYJS6iFUXGLg=; b=J3YbOK9aicc0iAlTHiQ0mWiHA2fu6wWKwJu1ijcgkOHBd5Cj4camtGIrffIHrXbfYX w9Sjjl1nGyxkbesT45kJMABPNUmmhCWy9+YyR5sRD5nGU1mSPxkROfM0/wdLCi6ojuTm qWkiYAJgGOBOPd+noPNVuvpPBCSsa/TDf3jbwlHb3awwZ4k5TjofxWpmXieIzKnopWoe BO0X1k3YYs2eb5OGv1HFIyeUzqVpv2sCPdVuMjr/UK17nF+Eajba6jmu9SUXnmeuly4T bSCB57D86+GPtIy9EuZ7wX+8YNwGMacJ+u6kTeq3GbLFGItVVfrDxI1yROAjkLg9HZaY Ws1w== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.104.80 with SMTP id gc16mr4849057lab.49.1361012291821; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:58:11 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.112.58.225 with HTTP; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 02:58:11 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <336731055.3000548.1360798935813.JavaMail.root@erie.cs.uoguelph.ca> Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:58:11 +0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Possible bug in NFSv4 with krb5p security? From: Doug Rabson To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Elias_M=E5rtenson?= X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnpW4MNUFiKkl6Uln8AJGKc1w0XvKOCQbNcZXFs2PusLbG4Oha4bDVCxKzVsgpYqL1SWWik Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.14 Cc: Rick Macklem , Benjamin Kaduk , freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:58:13 -0000 This may be a stupid question but does the user 'elias' exist in the local password database? If you are using heimdal from the base distribution and you have source, you should be able to build them with debug information which may help. When I was writing gssd, I mostly ran it under gdb to debug problems like this. To build something in the base with debug information, go to the directory in the source tree for that component and type something like 'make DEBUG_FLAGS=3D-g clean all install'. On 16 February 2013 09:24, Elias M=E5rtenson wrote: > OK, here I am replying to my own email. I just want to mention that I > removed the ports version of Heimdal, but with no change in behaviour. > > > On 16 February 2013 09:38, Elias M=E5rtenson wrote: > > > > > On 16 Feb, 2013 1:42 AM, "Benjamin Kaduk" wrote: > > > > > >> And yet one more thing: Heimdal ships with its own version of > > libgssapi. I > > >> can link gssd to it, but it won't run properly (it hangs pretty > early). > > > > > > I have forgotten: you are using Heimdal from ports, not from the base > > system? I remember it being easy to get into subtly-broken > configurations > > when both a ports and a base version are present. > > > > I am indeed using Heimdal from ports. This machine is also the KDC. I > > wasn't aware that there was a non-ports version available. > > > > What do you suggest I do? Simply remove the one from ports? Do I have t= o > > do something to activate the other one? > > > > (I have a hard time checking this as I am nowhere near the computers no= w) > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org= " >