From owner-freebsd-ports Thu Nov 1 0:21:30 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from ws2.piuha.net (ws2.piuha.net [195.165.196.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E84937B40A; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 00:21:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from ws4.piuha.net (ws4.piuha.net [195.165.196.4]) by ws2.piuha.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A19B6A90B; Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:20:57 +0200 (EET) Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2001 10:20:57 +0200 (EET) From: Martti Kuparinen X-X-Sender: martti@ws4.piuha.net To: roam@FreeBSD.org Cc: martti.kuparinen@iki.fi, Subject: Re: ports/31656: [PATCH] update for stunnel In-Reply-To: <200110311601.f9VG16Q15675@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: <20011101101848.X27407-100000@ws4.piuha.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Wed, 31 Oct 2001 roam@FreeBSD.org wrote: > Is there a reason for this port to USE_AUTOCONF? > I tried changing it to GNU_CONFIGURE=yes, and everything worked > just fine. I see that GNU_CONFIGURE was changed to USE_AUTOCONF > as part of your update to version 3.8.4, submitted in PR ports/19637; > what was the reason for this change? If I remember correctly there were changes made to configure.in back then but now that all those changes are merged in, there's no need to run autoconf (that's at least the case in NetBSD). So go a head, remove the GNU_CONFIGURE dependency! Martti --- Martti Kuparinen NetBSD - No media hype http://www.iki.fi/~kuparine/ http://www.netbsd.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message