From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 14 16:53:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8E63E37B401; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:53:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mailman.zeta.org.au (mailman.zeta.org.au [203.26.10.16]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F5EA43FB1; Sat, 14 Jun 2003 16:53:54 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bde@zeta.org.au) Received: from katana.zip.com.au (katana.zip.com.au [61.8.7.246]) by mailman.zeta.org.au (8.9.3p2/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA15656; Sun, 15 Jun 2003 09:53:41 +1000 Date: Sun, 15 Jun 2003 09:53:40 +1000 (EST) From: Bruce Evans X-X-Sender: bde@gamplex.bde.org To: "M. Warner Losh" In-Reply-To: <20030614.102541.32719717.imp@bsdimp.com> Message-ID: <20030615095053.G22725@gamplex.bde.org> References: <200306141157.h5EBviHg003862@repoman.freebsd.org> <20030614.102541.32719717.imp@bsdimp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: des@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/mk bsd.sys.mk X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2003 23:53:56 -0000 On Sat, 14 Jun 2003, M. Warner Losh wrote: > In message: <20030614.101420.71552621.imp@bsdimp.com> > "M. Warner Losh" writes: > : In message: <200306141157.h5EBviHg003862@repoman.freebsd.org> > : Dag-Erling Smorgrav writes: > : : Modified files: > : : share/mk bsd.sys.mk > : : Log: > : : Revert to a known-good state. Anyone desiring to experiment with stricter > : : global settings is free to do so in his or her own source tree. > : > : You beat me to this by about 4 hours. Thank you. While the c99/gnu99 > : stuff did uncover a number of problems, it also caused a number of > : unintended problems outside the source tree. > > Unfortunately, it retains CSTD in a form that's had much said against > it. I think it would have been better to back out one step further > until that can be resolved. I didn't notice any sayings against it except FUD. Bruce