From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 28 05:51:31 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B94B16A41F for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:51:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from postoffice.vicor-nb.com (postoffice.vicor.com [69.26.56.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41F0243D45 for ; Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:51:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by postoffice.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA3024CE9C3; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from postoffice.vicor-nb.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (postoffice.vicor-nb.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 12613-02; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [208.206.78.97] (julian.vicor-nb.com [208.206.78.97]) by postoffice.vicor-nb.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F2EE4CE9C2; Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:51:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <42E87261.7000302@elischer.org> Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 22:51:29 -0700 From: Julian Elischer User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050629 X-Accept-Language: en, hu MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Scott Long References: <42E85898.7040500@elischer.org> <42E85942.8050405@elischer.org> <42E85B7C.90005@elischer.org> <42E85DB1.4030605@samsco.org> In-Reply-To: <42E85DB1.4030605@samsco.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at postoffice.vicor.com Cc: FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: Trap for young players: was: kernel core files broken in 6.0? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2005 05:51:31 -0000 Scott Long wrote: > Julian Elischer wrote: > >> [...] >> which if it exists, will hold some completely different debug kernel :-/ >> >> Julian >> > > So does this mean that it's pointless to provide a kernel.debug on the > release media right now? no, just that if you BUILT the release you need to look in your release chroot for the kernel.debug instead of the directory that shows in 'uname -a". the kernel.debug in a release would be ok.. uh is there one? I have't noticed one (but I may have missed it). > > Scott