From owner-cvs-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Aug 20 18:19:38 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8A4B1065670; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:19:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from linimon@lonesome.com) Received: from mail.soaustin.net (pancho.soaustin.net [76.74.250.40]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A02898FC0A; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:19:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.soaustin.net (Postfix, from userid 502) id BDFB95615B; Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:19:37 -0500 (CDT) Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 13:19:37 -0500 From: Mark Linimon To: Alexey Dokuchaev Message-ID: <20110820181937.GA1454@lonesome.com> References: <201108201153.p7KBrPOV054618@repoman.freebsd.org> <4E4FD8A8.8070008@FreeBSD.org> <20110820162613.GA13064@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20110820162613.GA13064@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: cvs-ports@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, Matthias Andree , ports-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/misc/shared-mime-info Makefile X-BeenThere: cvs-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the ports tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Aug 2011 18:19:38 -0000 On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 04:26:13PM +0000, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Pav replied that we need to schedule few more -exp runs, but apparently > portmgr@ was ENOTIME back then. Since your request, we've done -exps to update the ruby default, the perl default, the apache default, and a number of other major things, all of which were desirable for 9.0. The njobs change in my opinion is more a nice-to-have. > (On an unrelated note, I'm still wondering why this discussion > was not mentioned in portmgr@ monthly report.) Probably just an oversight. We're aware that there are still a lot of requests in the queue. The addition of some new machines in the last few weeks at NYI has helped speed -exp runs up considerably. As well, work that flz and I have done on the "new" pointyhat codebase have made the dispatcher more stable -- now it only fails on "disk full" conditions. My code to recover from that still isn't working right. All of this means that we can turn -exps far more quickly than we ever have before. mcl