From owner-freebsd-ports  Tue Sep 17 12:13:29 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id CC4B037B401; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:13:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (rdu57-17-158.nc.rr.com [66.57.17.158])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 7FF4D43E3B; Tue, 17 Sep 2002 12:13:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com)
Received: from [10.2.1.2] (vpn-client-2.marcuscom.com [10.2.1.2])
	by creme-brulee.marcuscom.com (8.12.5/8.12.5) with ESMTP id g8HJAEiv059113;
	Tue, 17 Sep 2002 15:10:14 -0400 (EDT)
	(envelope-from marcus@marcuscom.com)
Subject: Re: ports/42870: mozilla-devel should be updated to 1.2a
From: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com>
To: Joe Kelsey <joek@mail.flyingcroc.net>
Cc: jerry@thehutt.org, freebsd-gnome <freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG>,
	freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
In-Reply-To: <3D877DA3.6070003@mail.flyingcroc.net>
References: 
	<3D8775E9.4050409@mail.flyingcroc.net>	<1032287836.331.66.camel@gyros.marcus
	com.com> 	<20020917184537.GA22391@nomad.thehutt.org>
	<1032288591.331.71.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com> 
	<3D877DA3.6070003@mail.flyingcroc.net>
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.0.8 
Date: 17 Sep 2002 15:13:14 -0400
Message-Id: <1032289994.331.76.camel@gyros.marcuscom.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.0 required=5.0
	tests=IN_REP_TO,AWL
	version=2.31
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-ports.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-ports>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-ports>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 15:08, Joe Kelsey wrote:
> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
> > On Tue, 2002-09-17 at 14:45, Jerry A! wrote:
> >>Could you please give some thought as to how to name
> >>/usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla before you make the repo copy?  For instance,
> >>should it be a symlink to /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla-${ver} or what?
> >>
> >>The reason I ask is b/c ports like flashplugin-mozilla and plugger break
> >>if /usr/X11R6/lib/mozilla doesn't exist.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > I thought of keeping things in line with the way they are now.  That is:
> > 
> > ${X11BASE}/lib/mozilla --> mozilla-1.1
> > ${X11BASE}/lib/mozilla-devel --> mozilla-1.2a
> > ${X11BASE}/lib/mozilla-vendor --> mozilla-1.0.1
> 
> www/flashplugin-mozilla/Makefile contains the line:
> 
> do-install:
>          @${INSTALL_PROGRAM} ${WRKSRC}/npflash.so 
> ${X11BASE}/lib/mozilla/plugins
> 
> which requires the mozilla directory to exist.  It needs to change 
> "/mozilla/" to something like "/$(MOZILLA_HOME)/", where MOZILLA_HOME is 
>   set in make.conf or something.  The problem of plugins is a difficult 
> one.  www/flashplugin sets a variable TARGET_DIR in it's Makefile.  I 
> think that there is no real answer to doing this automatically without 
> inventing a lot of make cruft.

This then begs the question of should I make this change now so close to
the release?  I don't want things to ship out with a lot of popular
pieces in a broken state.  While people might not agree with the Mozilla
naming scheme right now, the ports do function.

Joe

> 
> /Joe
> 
> 
-- 
PGP Key : http://www.marcuscom.com/pgp.asc


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message