From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 6 20:02:09 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AAC2816A5C7 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:02:09 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [69.147.83.40]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE7543CA5 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 20:01:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id kB6JeC8a040777 for ; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:40:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id kB6JeCMK040772; Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:40:12 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2006 19:40:12 GMT Message-Id: <200612061940.kB6JeCMK040772@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org From: "Boris S." Cc: Subject: Re: kern/106400: fatal trap 12 at restart of PF with ALTQ if ng0 device has detached X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: "Boris S." List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter \(pf\)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:02:09 -0000 The following reply was made to PR kern/106400; it has been noted by GNATS. From: "Boris S." To: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, bst2006@dva.dyndns.org, volker@vwsoft.com, glebius@FreeBSD.org Cc: Subject: Re: kern/106400: fatal trap 12 at restart of PF with ALTQ if ng0 device has detached Date: Wed, 06 Dec 2006 20:17:24 +0100 I use ALTQ primarily for priorizing tcp acks. Tell me if I'm wrong, but I think it is not possible to priorize TCP ACKS on encapsulated PPPoE data on the 'real' interface. Bandwidth limiting on ng0 works great if I left some bandwidth for the PPPoE overhead. Beside this, I can't currently limit the real interface, because the dsl-modem is connected in another room on the main LAN. I don't have a dedicated NIC for the modem. Boris