From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 8 14:20:04 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D13AA106567A; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:20:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from parrot.aev.net (parrot.aev.net [212.31.247.179]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5AED58FC38; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 14:20:03 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from soth.ventu (adsl-ull-34-20.51-151.net24.it [151.51.20.34]) (authenticated bits=128) by parrot.aev.net (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m78EJr8N012695 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:19:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Received: from alamar.ventu (alamar.ventu [10.1.2.18]) by soth.ventu (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m78EKxpI085794; Fri, 8 Aug 2008 16:20:59 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from ml@netfence.it) Message-ID: <489C560A.4020809@netfence.it> Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 16:19:54 +0200 From: Andrea Venturoli User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080727) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Kris Kennaway References: <489C2AB0.1000401@netfence.it> <489C533C.6050103@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <489C533C.6050103@FreeBSD.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.64 on 212.31.247.179 Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dump locks again X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 14:20:04 -0000 Kris Kennaway ha scritto: > This was fixed in 7.0-STABLE. > > Kris Thanks Kris. Since this is a critical production box, I'm a bit scared to track Stable. Do you know when this will be merged into a release (7.1 I suppose)? Would it be safer to just get this single patch (if possible at all)? I've also been advised (off list), to switch from the default 4BSD scheduler to ULE. What are the implications of this? Would it solve this specific problem or would I still need to patch/upgrade? bye & Thanks av.