From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 10 22:14:23 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 270231065671 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3E4448FC12 for ; Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:14:21 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m5AMEFbw013171; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:14:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.14.2/8.14.2/Submit) with ESMTP id m5AMEFuQ013168; Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:14:15 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:14:14 +0200 (CEST) From: Wojciech Puchar To: Chad Perrin In-Reply-To: <20080610152240.GB66787@kokopelli.hydra> Message-ID: <20080611001227.K13017@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <20080610152240.GB66787@kokopelli.hydra> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: FreeBSD Questions Subject: Re: firewall high-load performance X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2008 22:14:23 -0000 > My preferred firewall these days, for general use, is pf. I seem to > recall someone who has used it in high-load scenarios that it can kinda > choke at high loads, though I don't recall whether that was due to pf > itself or the fact he was running it on OpenBSD. Until now, this has not > been a concern for me. it would be good to check out ipfw. at least it's IMHO much cleaner and easier to make rules i need, but it is fast. but please check, i don't have any side-to-side comparision. of course it depends how you rules are complicated and how good/bad you will define them.